History Fast Track 2 Spring 2018
Course Class # Days & Times Room Instructor Meeting Dates HIST 101 30863 MW 12:45 pm - 3:55 pm ESC-105 Frank Turner 4/2/18 - 5/23/18 HIST 101 HYBRID 33999 MoWe 8 - 9:25 am MD-305 &
William Jahnel 4/2/18 - 5/23/18 HIST 102 32946 TuTh 11:10 am - 2:20 pm ESC-105 Ramon Veloso 4/2/18 - 5/24/18 HIST 102 30834 MoWe 2:20 - 5:30 pm MD-304 Marina Parenti 4/2/18 - 5/23/18 HIST 106 30793 MoWe 7:40 - 10:50 am MD-316 Travis Ritt 4/2/18 - 5/23/18 HIST 140 33017 TuTh 6 - 9:10 pm MD-217 Henry Lesperance Jr. 4/2/18 - 5/24/18 HIST 141 34009 TBA INTERNET J Rodrigo Jacobo Jr. 4/2/18 - 5/26/18
The real sin that the absence of a historical sense encourages is presentism, in the sense of exaggerating our present problems out of all proportion to those that have previously existed. It lies in believing that things are much worse than they have ever been—and, thus, than they really are—or are uniquely threatening rather than familiarly difficult. Every episode becomes an epidemic, every image is turned into a permanent injury, and each crisis is a historical crisis in need of urgent aggressive handling—even if all experience shows that aggressive handling of such situations has in the past, quite often made things worse. . . .
What history actually shows is that nothing works out as planned, and that everything has unintentional consequences. History doesn’t show that we should never go to war—sometimes there’s no better alternative. But it does show that the results are entirely uncontrollable, and that we are far more likely to be made by history than to make it. History is past, and singular, and the same year never comes round twice.
Adam Gopnik, “Does It Help To Know History?” Daily Comment, The New Yorker, August 28, 2014.
“ . . . history offers a storehouse of information about how people and societies behave. Understanding the operations of people and societies is difficult, though a number of disciplines make the attempt. An exclusive reliance on current data would needlessly handicap our efforts. How can we evaluate war if the nation is at peace—unless we use historical materials? How can we understand genius, the influence of technological innovation, or the role that beliefs play in shaping family life, if we don’t use what we know about experiences in the past? Some social scientists attempt to formulate laws or theories about human behavior. But even these recourses depend on historical information, except for in limited, often artificial cases in which experiments can be devised to determine how people act. Major aspects of a society’s operation, like mass elections, missionary activities, or military alliances, cannot be set up as precise experiments.
“Consequently, history must serve, however imperfectly, as our laboratory, and data from the past must serve as our most vital evidence in the unavoidable quest to figure out why our complex species behaves as it does in societal settings. This, fundamentally, is why we cannot stay away from history: it offers the only extensive evidential base for the contemplation and analysis of how societies function, and people need to have some sense of how societies function simply to run their own lives. History Helps Us Understand Change and How the Society We Live in Came to Be.
What Skills Does a Student of History Develop?
What does a well-trained student of history, schooled to work on past materials and on case studies in social change, learn how to do? The list is manageable, but it contains several overlapping categories.
The Ability to Assess Evidence. The study of history builds experience in dealing with and assessing various kinds of evidence—the sorts of evidence historians use in shaping the most accurate pictures of the past that they can. Learning how to interpret the statements of past political leaders—one kind of evidence—helps form the capacity to distinguish between the objective and the self-serving among statements made by present-day political leaders. Learning how to combine different kinds of evidence—public statements, private records, numerical data, visual materials—develops the ability to make coherent arguments based on a variety of data. This skill can also be applied to information encountered in everyday life.
The Ability to Assess Conflicting Interpretations. Learning history means gaining some skill in sorting through diverse, often conflicting interpretations. Understanding how societies work—the central goal of historical study—is inherently imprecise, and the same certainly holds true for understanding what is going on in the present day. Learning how to identify and evaluate conflicting interpretations is an essential citizenship skill for which history, as an often-contested laboratory of human experience, provides training.
Peter N. Stearns, “Why Study History” (1998). This is just a portion of this essay, posted at the web site of the American Historical Association. Follow this link to read the entire essay.
Another useful essay at this site is by Jacob Anbinder, “How A Major in History Gives You the Intangible Edge.”
Finally, at the same site, review “History Tuning Project: 2016 History Discipline Core”.